Sup-projekt (TP) 22

Projektnehmer:
Rostock University, Faculty of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, Institute for Management of Rural Areas, Professor of Geodesy und Geoinformatics

TP-Titel:
Investigation of internet based information platform and data documenting system for the cooperative projekt

TP Kurztitel:
Project information system

TP-Ziele:
Administration of a web server for outward presentation and maintenance of the project information for publicity.

Support for coordinated transfer of project data and communication of project partners in a protected area of the web site.

Supply of internet technology and web services to support interoperable data- and service infrastructur for application in information driven plant production.

Stellung des TP im Verbund:
Center of digital storage for data from all project parts and platform for project coordination and -control.
Supply of hardware and software for spatial data infrastructure (SDI) for precision agriculture.
Configuration of services and implementation of data structures given through input of the data modelling project TP7.
Integration of automated process dokumentation TP 8 and support for the development of a web server for the supply of dynamicaly process data retrieval.
Supply of preagro geodata for information processing in farm management systems TP 17.
Consideration of schemas from standardization process for office software TP 18 and for the standardized data format agroXML for precision farming TP 19 for the implementation of services and supply of data.
Supply of technical basics for the investigation of sustainability in the value-added chain of plant production TP 1.


We build a spatial geodata infrastructure for precision agriculture

Abstract:
Geo-Information (GI) are an essential component of the public, economical and private life. The importance of Geo-Information is increasingly recognized within all ranges of the society. A high economical potential is assumed when using GI systematically and wherever possible. Nevertheless the market for GI has not developed as strong as expected, may be because organizational, juridical and technical limitations. A solution to overcome this type of problems is the establishment of spatial data infrastructures (SDI).
In agriculture and especially in Precision Agriculture the importance of Geo-Information is rising up, too. Precision Agriculture is dealing with the assimilation of agricultural applications to the natural heterogeneity outside in the fields. Using such technologies the total yield should increase, the means of production should decrease and the environment should be conserved. The assimilation to the spatial variability requires spatial data about the soil, the crop, the terrain, the land machinery, and the applications. Special analysis must be executed with GIS and many different data has to be managed. Farmers spend much time in the data management, they usually are not that interested in the procurement and evaluation of data. By using of different devices, which support different data formats, and improperly spatial reference systems the farmer has to transform the data between proprietary GIS and coordinate systems. The low economical potential for the reduction of means of production enforce to save time and cost in data management. In addition the demands on traceability, sustainability and a transparently crop production are increasing. A solution from the farmers perspective will be the relocation of the tasks for data management to service providers, which are able to establish a comprehensive SDI. The introduction of interoperability and a web-service based SDI in agriculture has many advantages and is related to many actual GI-related research themes, expressed also on the AGILE conferences. An operational SDI in agriculture supports e-Government, e.g. in topics such as the European integrated management and controlling system (InVeKoS) and consolidation of farming. If Geo-Information from agriculture will become a wider accessibility through a SDI it may be easily used in other communities and for other purposes, like disaster management to evaluate the diseases or the damages in crop through natural disasters like dryness or flood. In Precision Agriculture also digital terrain models, soil data or detailed data about the water flows are often used. This information can also be of interest for other e.g. environmental purposes. With the development of an operational SDI the semantic interoperability will be improved. The building of semantic homogeneous data models as well as standardized metadata belongs to the development of an interoperable Geo-spatial technology. The implementation of spatial services as web services is matching the idea of the OpenGIS Consortium (OGC).
The problems, which were described above, inspired us to carry out research in this field. For the design of an interoperable SDI some common aspects were examined by researchers such as Vckovski (1999). He defines the interoperability simply as “ability to exchange and integrate information”, pp. 32. Bishr (1998) divides it in semantically, schematically and syntactically heterogeneity. He stated that the semantic depends on the subject area. The heterogeneity in names has to be solved by standardization. The cognitive heterogeneity can be solved by using the concept of Extensible Markup Language (XML) name spaces. The syntactical heterogeneity, as the third form, means, for example, that geometry can be coded by vector or raster structure. To describe the geometry in a uniform structure, the Geography Markup Language was established and is coming more and more into use. In former days data conversion was used to realize the interoperability. To convert the data from one system to the data format of another system, look up tables were used (Sondheim, et al., 1999). In this strategy errors, redundancy and inconsistency can occur. To minimize the loss of information a semantically all-embracing model was introduced. The form of conversation is known as “smart translation” or “semantic translation”. In the newer age were used special transfer formats, e.g. XML or the Spatial Data Transfer Format (SDTS). They divide into data model and data format. Today the term of interoperability is not restricted to the data exchange rather it is extended also to the transfer of functionality between different systems. This will be realized by interfaces. We know many manufacturer dependend interfaces. The communication between these proprietary interfaces is often a problem, like in the case of Precision Agriculture. To get the independence of those interfaces manufacturer neutral interfaces was developed. One well-known is the Structured Query Language (SQL). To realize the communication between different clients and data base systems in a distributed client server architecture middleware was integrated.
The development of such manufacturer independent interfaces for Geo-Information is one of the primary targets of the OGC. All the investigations of the last years move along to there initiatives and flow into abstract and implementation specifications. Whether the implementation specification can be used for the purposes of a SDI in Precision Agriculture is one of the first aims of our research. We would like to find answers to the questions: Which standards can be used and what has to be standardized? We would like to implement a SDI concept for Precision Agriculture on a concrete use case. The development of a metadata standard for Precision Agriculture data was investigated by Korduan (2002). This was a prerequisite to establish a SDI prototype. The main components of our concept are the data, the data storage, the OGC Web Services and an OGC Client. The authors worked from 1999 to 2003 in the German research and development project preagro to establish a management information system, Bill, Korduan (2002). More details about the preagro project can be found under www.preagro.de. In this project many different and heterogeneous data were collected. The data pool build from practical farms was an ideal basis for the development of data models and a data storage system with real characteristics for Precision Agriculture. The data pool was also used for the extraction of important Precision Agriculture related metadata to describe the data and to realize the data archiving and retrieval in a catalogue system. A metadata profile based on the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (CSDGM) was developed (Korduan, 2003).
In the mean time services have been specified by the OGC to realize a SDI and frame works are available to implement it. The decision about the service, which should be used, depends on the kind of the GI as well as on the data format and the functionality which should be provided. In the use case any actor plays a role as data provider which only provide raster data. Data providers have to implement a Web Service which support the access to their own vector and raster data and provide raster data to the clients. This functionality can be supported by the OGC Web Map Service. An OGC Web Coverage Service is not necessary because the raster data will only be used as background images in the client. Actors that provide vector data, which the client need for further usage, have to implement a Web Feature Service. A third type of actors may work as data broker because they request a foreign Web Service as Web client to access data and provide it through its own service to other clients. The result of our research work is a concept and a prototype of a SDI for Precision Agriculture which supports the use case “soil sampling”.